From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Sat Jan 14 15:13:40 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722ACCAF2F3 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A6919A3 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0EFDe5A001857 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:13:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 212323] tests/sys/acl/01:main fails due to changes in NFSv4 ACL behavior on ^/head Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:13:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: trasz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:13:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212323 --- Comment #5 from Edward Tomasz Napierala --- Harald, that would be very welcome - I do know a bit or two about NFSv4 ACL= s, but have no practical experience with NTFS, so your feedback would be very useful. As for the revert - _some_ changes were reverted. Others were not, and tha= t's why the regression tests don't pass. My personal preference (although I'd = like to know your opinion first, because of NTFS) would be to just revert it all, back to how it was throughout 10.X, with the addition of the "I" flag (whic= h is a good thing), verified by passing the regression tests. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=