From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug  7 14:34:11 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BAC16A4F0
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Aug 2006 14:34:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org)
Received: from poup.poupinou.org (poup.poupinou.org [195.101.94.96])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D20043D45
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Aug 2006 14:34:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org)
Received: from ducrot by poup.poupinou.org with local (Exim)
	id 1GA6Ad-0003VA-00; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 16:33:31 +0200
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:33:31 +0200
To: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <20060807143331.GS17014@poupinou.org>
References: <200608071324.k77DObNm028590@lurza.secnetix.de>
	<44D741AD.4040404@andric.com> <20060807140109.GR17014@poupinou.org>
	<1154960343.40530.28.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1154960343.40530.28.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: acpi: bad write to port
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 14:34:11 -0000

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:19:03PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> However the 0x80 port is a single byte wide - and his AML is trying to
> write 32 bits to it, so it's falling foul of the (correct) blocking of
> writes to port in the range 0x81 - 0x83.

Oops, yes.  You are indeed right.

-- 
Bruno Ducrot

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.