From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 14:32:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6819F16A4CE; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brane.freislich.nom.za (brane.freislich.nom.za [196.7.162.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328BD43D1F; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:32:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ianf@freislich.nom.za) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by brane.freislich.nom.za with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1BH8Hx-000Ag3-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:32:49 +0200 To: John Baldwin From: Ian FREISLICH In-Reply-To: Message from John Baldwin of "Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:22:14 -0400." <200404231122.14650.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:32:49 +0200 Sender: ianf@freislich.nom.za Message-Id: cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: peter@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic: page fault during install_ap_tramp() X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:32:57 -0000 > On Thursday 22 April 2004 08:39 am, Ian Freislich wrote: > > Hi > > > > I started getting this panic from Monday this week. The system is > > an old gigabyte dual pentium II. Scheduler is SCHED_BSD if that > > makes a difference so early on in the boot. A while back I got a > > similar panic > > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1649457+1655104+/usr/local/www > >/db/text/2004/freebsd-current/20040208.freebsd-current) Which, in summary, > > jhb thought was as a result of a missing MADT in the ACPI whatever. This > > problem in the above link went away and > > has now resurfaced after about 2 months. I do a fresh world and > > kernel from current sources about every two days. > > Hmm, (subject changed for the real panic). Can you verify if a 4.x > SMP kernel boots ok on this box? This might be a pmap bug of some > sort. Peter might have a guess so I've cc'd him. I don't know about a recent 4.x SMP kernel, but this box has run stably on SMP kernels from 2.x days right up to 4.8(9?) when I changed to -current a while back. If you want me to try a recent 4.x kernel I'll do that. Ian -- Ian Freislich