From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 16 12:26:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E10B106568B for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james-freebsd-fs2@jrv.org) Received: from mail.jrv.org (adsl-70-243-84-13.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [70.243.84.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FEC8FC12 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kremvax.housenet.jrv (kremvax.housenet.jrv [192.168.3.124]) by mail.jrv.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBGCQbAq032325; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:26:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from james-freebsd-fs2@jrv.org) Authentication-Results: mail.jrv.org; domainkeys=pass (testing) header.from=james-freebsd-fs2@jrv.org DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=enigma; d=jrv.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mbREQhyOaSXrLfyiHEXd5qRWJQj6zGm17WH1Shw6Z/mfBuuRNIl4l2PkKJ/gH4d3I gQ16jZYOFncfhAYvr8adey82TNRmw6y//SPjUMGyTVoLf6Hh9L8cyTqZfkMqkHgZtEz GYpTHiYSODzoNjjAOJuG8FYLGwtv18Pe1kgsTTA= Message-ID: <4B28D1FD.4040507@jrv.org> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:26:37 -0600 From: "James R. Van Artsdalen" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borja Marcos References: <20091029205121.GB3418@garage.freebsd.pl> <9AA2C968-F09D-473D-BD13-F13B3F94ED60@sarenet.es> <20091214154750.GF1666@garage.freebsd.pl> <86C70417-E465-4295-8B58-60EA8887ADA3@sarenet.es> In-Reply-To: <86C70417-E465-4295-8B58-60EA8887ADA3@sarenet.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs Subject: Re: zfs receive gives: internal error: Argument list too long X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:26:39 -0000 Borja Marcos wrote: > Weird, this was one of the virtual machines that crashed often when doing the zfs send/zfs receive tests. Maybe something was damaged? Using ZFS in a Virtual Machine is a risky business since many VM hosts (VMware and VirtualBox at least) discard any SYNCHRONIZE issued by the guest. VirtualBox has a way to turn SYNCHRONIZE functionality back on. Make sure you know how the VM software handles SYNCHRONIZE or FLUSH before using ZFS there.