From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 17 10:25: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19B937B424 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:24:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f3HHOqh94775; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:24:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:24:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200104171724.f3HHOqh94775@earth.backplane.com> To: Doug Barton Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , "'current@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost References: <200104161634.f3GGYZs11356@aslan.scsiguy.com> <200104162146.f3GLkGT82369@earth.backplane.com> <3ADBF9FA.9D1C4DB4@DougBarton.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :Matt Dillon wrote: : :> It is not implying that at all. There is no black and white here. :> This is a case where spending a huge amount of time and complexity :> to get the efficiency down to the Nth degree is nothing but a waste :> of time. What matters is what the user sees, what performance :> the application gets, and how many bugs you introduce when optimizing :> something that might not need optimizing. : : Sooo..... sounds like making "on" the default in -current is a worthy :experiment? : :Doug :-- Testing it 'on' in stable on production systems and observing the relative change in performance is a worthy experiment. Testing it 'on' in current is just an experiment. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message