From owner-cvs-all  Sat Mar 24  8:12:45 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5148637B71B; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:12:36 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA08933;
	Sun, 25 Mar 2001 02:12:34 +1000
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 02:11:58 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org
To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include/arpa inet.h src/sys/netinet in.h src
In-Reply-To: <20010324.232141.03996757.ume@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103250205180.29136-100000@besplex.bde.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:

> >>>>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 23:33:11 -0800 (PST)
> >>>>> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> said:
> 
> jhb> It seems i386 is evil and doesn't use in_addr_t or in_port_t in its
> jhb> machine/endian.h.  This probably breaks ia64 as well.  Will you move in_port_t
> jhb> into sys/types.h as well and then convert the i386 endian.h to use the right
> jhb> types?
> 
>   Why is there definition of in_addr_t only in alpha?  I believe it's
> MI.

The alpha version was obtained from NetBSD, but the i386 version was
obtained from 386BSD (via FreeBSD-1.1).

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message