Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:36:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195117] [maintainer update] ports-mgmt/portrac: Mark BROKEN on versions earlier than 10. Message-ID: <bug-195117-13-ETnCttP9xT@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-195117-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-195117-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195117 mario.g.pavlov@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #149528|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #152630| |maintainer-approval+ Flags| | --- Comment #3 from mario.g.pavlov@gmail.com --- Created attachment 152630 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152630&action=edit portrac-0.5.diff Actually I just now saw that my update on this PR got lost due to the bugzilla maintenance issue. In my previous update I was explaining that this port uses not only the new compiler but other features from FreeBSD 10 as well such as the new pkg tool. As a maintainer of the port and owner of the code I think it is best if the port stays as simple as possible and be supported only on FreeBSD 10 or later. I'm aware that pkg-ng and the new compiler infrastructure can be used on earlier versions of FreeBSD but it's not worth the effort. Not to mention that the port uses QT5. I'd like to ask you to re-open this PR and commit my patch which I also updated as per Bartek's proposal to add check for ${OPSYS}. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-195117-13-ETnCttP9xT>