From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Sep 16 12:31:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA17862 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 12:31:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peedub.muc.de (newpc.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA17663 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 12:30:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.muc.de) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.9.1/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA05020; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 21:12:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <199809161912.VAA05020@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Hallam Oaks P/L list account" cc: "freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: 'struct isa_device' advice sought Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Sep 1998 22:24:39 +1000." <199809161224.WAA22191@mail.aussie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 21:12:08 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Hallam Oaks P/L list account" writes: >My question is this : is the concept of a PCI card masquerading (in a limited >sense) as an ISA one a legitimate approach ? Is it likely to cause problems ? >I know it's a kludge but the alternative is also not particularly desirable. > >Any advice appreciated. > I think there's precedent for this for e.g. the ed driver. See i386/isa/if_ed.c and pci/if_ed_p.c. IIRC the isa driver calls the pci driver to check for a pci card. --- Gary Jennejohn Home - garyj@muc.de Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message