Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:51:46 -0800 From: aurfalien <aurfalien@gmail.com> To: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> Cc: "freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Controller for ZFS Message-ID: <1107DEAB-75FD-4967-B7D4-4A29FC9CAB00@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFHbX1%2Bj2BV%2B-5KREg%2BgxhDfybS2Pyr41qOqeLrJDga8qfz3Hw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CEA907F4.12261%shawn.wallbridge@imaginaryforces.com> <49F719A9-AC50-4917-8809-F51EBD4F5D0F@sarenet.es> <CAFHbX1J3zO44-KC=Os0bu=wBNoatm3LqUS3fSPjAbzh2OaxRWQ@mail.gmail.com> <3E00D7C0-68EE-4838-BD99-0BF2011DBC06@sarenet.es> <CAFHbX1%2Bj2BV%2B-5KREg%2BgxhDfybS2Pyr41qOqeLrJDga8qfz3Hw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 14, 2013, at 4:59 AM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> = wrote: >> Do you recommend more recent firmware versions, though? I was playing = with this for a while and it really >> was tiresome to be loading different firmware versions. >=20 > 100% agree on how tiresome it is! I was going from messages on this > list, especially from Steven Hartland, who seems to know what he is > talking about: >=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2013-July/017728.html >=20 > and >=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2013-May/017284.html >=20 > """ > The conclusion is LSI 2008 HBA with FW below P13 will eat the data on = your SATA > disks if you use WS16 due to the following bug Well, as I understand in general one should match the fw with the = driver. So FreeBSD 9 uses v14 LSI driver, so one would flash v14 fw on the = cards. In FreeBSD 10 it looks as if its v16, so one would flash v16 fw. In my tests in a 9 env, I can confirm that the systems runs better with = v14 all around. Thoughts? - aurf=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1107DEAB-75FD-4967-B7D4-4A29FC9CAB00>