From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Oct 25 17: 6: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (beastie.mckusick.com [209.31.233.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FEA37B406 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.mckusick.com (8.11.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f9Q05vQ05273; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:06:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com) Message-Id: <200110260006.f9Q05vQ05273@beastie.mckusick.com> To: Peter Wemm Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:36:02 PDT." <20011025233602.587C63808@overcee.netplex.com.au> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:05:57 -0700 From: Kirk McKusick Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I vote for option (3), 64-bit time_t for all 64 bit architectures. I would go along with option (4) provided that the change-over came with FreeBSD 5.0 and it was not MFC'ed back to the 4.X series. The change from 4.X to 5.0 will have enough other things going on that I do not think that adding the time_t change would cause a lot more pain provided that old dump tapes and log files could be read. Kirk McKusick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message