Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:10:08 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 239266] lang/gcc8 fails to build with clang8: tree-vect-loop.c:4979:12: error: expected unqualified-id
Message-ID:  <bug-239266-29464-VCdGnJRYwG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-239266-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-239266-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239266

Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com

--- Comment #2 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #1)

I use patches for the type of issue for:

?       /usr/ports/devel/powerpc64-gcc/files/patch-gcc_tree-vect-loop.c
?       /usr/ports/lang/gcc8/files/patch-gcc_tree-vect-loop.c
?       /usr/ports/lang/gcc9/files/patch-gcc_tree-vect-loop.c

(I've not done anything with gcc10. I used to have such for gcc7
but quit using gcc7.)

My changes long predate recent ELFv2 activity, powerpc64-gcc's
patch file going back to 2017-Sep-30.

What I did was rename vec_step to vec_step_renamed in order
to avoid hitting clang's powerpc family specific definition
of the name (tied to altivec).

As I remember the source code in the area has changed over
the time frame and the 3 patches are not all identical.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239266-29464-VCdGnJRYwG>