From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 24 12:59:00 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB55016A416
	for <openoffice@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:59:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de)
Received: from dd2718.kasserver.com (dd2718.kasserver.com [81.209.184.159])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDC343D82
	for <openoffice@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:59:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dslb-084-061-124-203.pools.arcor-ip.net
	[84.61.124.203])
	by dd2718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE85DA249;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:58:57 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <453E0E13.4070106@chillt.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:58:59 +0100
From: Bartosz Fabianowski <freebsd@chillt.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061021)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Angelo Turetta <aturetta@commit.it>
References: <453D1419.8080009@chillt.de> <453DFF9A.1050702@commit.it>
In-Reply-To: <453DFF9A.1050702@commit.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] openoffice.org-2.0 fails to compile on 6-STABLE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:59:00 -0000

> The problem started, I think, with the 20061013 update of the gcc-4.1.x 
> port, which is only required when you compile for AMD64.

I am on i386 but because I prefer gcj over Java, my build is also using 
the gcc 4.1 port. This would explain while most other people don't run 
into the problem.

- Bartosz