Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:44:38 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org, multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: snd_emu10kx driver imported Message-ID: <20060718054438.GB33301@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20060715225058.5ff3a750@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <20060715225058.5ff3a750@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:50:58PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > I just imported the emu10kx driver which is available since a while in > ports. When loading the catch-all sound module is loaded, it will use > the emu10kx driver instead of the emu10k1 driver now. The old module is > still available in case the emu10kx driver doesn't work (we want to > hear about such cases). > > Currently both drivers return the same priority when probing. When all > sound devices are compiled into the kernel, the kernel will chose one > of the drivers. You will notice which one (I don't know)... > Personally I think old emu10k1(4) driver should return a BUS_PROBE_LOW_PRIORITY in order to give emu10kx(4) a chance. That way it would get more success/failure reports from users accoustomed to old emu10k1(4) driver. > At some point in time the emu10k1 driver will vanish. > > Bye, > Alexander. > -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060718054438.GB33301>