Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 06:18:36 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205367] Multiple ports: PERL should be used instead of PERL5 Message-ID: <bug-205367-13-lvPE062Uz3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205367-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205367-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205367 --- Comment #4 from Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #3) > Mk/Uses/perl5.mk works as intended Thank you very much, Chris, for the reassurance. But -- just so that no one has even a slightest shadow of doubt that, what seems like assuring confidence is, actually, mistaken arrogance -- could you, please, elaborate? For example, I described a scenario, where perl5.mk seems to offer an invalid path -- was that really intentional? If so, why is such behavior useful? Please, advise. Thanks, once again. > A pr(1) will need to be raised on the/any offending ports. Huh?! This stupefies me... What does a file-printing utility have to do with this problem? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205367-13-lvPE062Uz3>