From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Oct 7 06:36:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA19295 for freebsd-doc-outgoing; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 06:36:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mushi.colo.neosoft.com (mushi.colo.neosoft.com [206.109.6.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA19290 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 06:36:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@taronga.com) Received: (qmail 25654 invoked from network); 7 Oct 1998 13:36:34 -0000 Received: from bonkers.neosoft.com (HELO bonkers.taronga.com) (root@206.109.2.48) by mushi.colo.neosoft.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 1998 13:36:34 -0000 Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id IAA09158 for freebsd-doc@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 08:36:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 08:36:00 -0500 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Message-Id: <199810071336.IAA09158@bonkers.taronga.com> Newsgroups: taronga.freebsd.doc Subject: Re: Dos and Don'ts References: <19981006071237.02443@follo.net> <19981006083809.00946@follo.net> <19981006083809.00946@follo.net> <19981007123122.O27781@freebie.lemis.com> Organization: none Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org To: undisclosed-recipients:; [hmmmm... did my last message get through?] I personally prefer the batch orientation of kernel ppp. For someone used to setting up UUCP it's really quite simple. In article <19981007123122.O27781@freebie.lemis.com>, Greg Lehey wrote: >DON'T use vi or ee, use Emacs, the One True Editor. ee is wimpy, and > vi is impossible to use. Yeh, that's how I see the ppp/pppd rule too. >The sendmail/exim rule definitely belongs in the same category. Right, any idiot knows you should use qmail. (grinning, ducking, running like hell) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message