From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 6 03:00:48 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA09057 for current-outgoing; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 03:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dub-img-1.compuserve.com (dub-img-1.compuserve.com [149.174.206.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA09045 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 03:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dub-img-1.compuserve.com (8.6.10/5.950515) id FAA19959; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 05:58:37 -0400 Date: 06 Aug 96 05:57:33 EDT From: Jan Knepper <100626.3506@CompuServe.COM> To: Khetan Gajjar , "[FreeBSD current]" Subject: Re: compile time Message-ID: <960806095732_100626.3506_BHL105-1@CompuServe.COM> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Kheten Gajjar wrote: /* > A kernel recompile on 2.1.0 takes for me: > text data bss dec hex > 954368 61440 74356 1090164 10a274 > 257.32 real 162.45 user 18.24 sys Wow! What machine have you got ? */ A Pentium Pro 200, 64 MB RAM, NCR SCSI-2 2.1 GB HD, 6x SCSI CD-ROM... I am running my own company and have a couple of machine's. Only P's though. The PP200 is the latest toy. I think it is in for almost 2 months now, may be longer already. I usually develop in C++ for Window NT/95, 3.1x, OS/2 Warp, Novell NetWare. Header files and other stuff is getting so *huge* that a faster machines really pays off these days... I used a P120 before. The compile time turned out to be LESS than half what is was before! That is what I call improvement. Don't worry, be Kneppie, Jan