From owner-cvs-lib  Mon Jan 15 17:40:49 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-lib
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA29088
          for cvs-lib-outgoing; Mon, 15 Jan 1996 17:40:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA29083
          Mon, 15 Jan 1996 17:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA05361; Mon, 15 Jan 1996 17:40:33 -0800
To: John Polstra <jdp@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/csu/i386 c++rt0.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Jan 1996 09:53:27 PST."
             <199601151753.JAA27198@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 17:40:33 -0800
Message-ID: <5359.821756433@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

>   Modified:    lib/csu/i386  c++rt0.c
>   Log:
>   Check the count in the first word of __CTOR_LIST__ before executing
>   the loop that invokes the static constructors.  That makes it safe
>   to link c++rt0.o into any shared library, even one that does not
>   have any static constructors.  Formerly, doing that would cause a

Does this mean that we can remove the CPLUSPLUSLIB declarations
from the Makefiles of the C++ libraries we make?

					Jordan