From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 03:11:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854AB16A4CE for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 03:11:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.caraldi.com (caraldi.com [62.212.102.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12C443D1D for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 03:11:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jbq@anyware-tech.com) Received: from pc61.anyware-tech.com (unknown [217.112.237.100]) by mail.caraldi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4A02473; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:11:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by pc61.anyware-tech.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 24397188C5; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:11:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:11:07 +0100 From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040205111104.GA21102@pc61.anyware> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , Chuck Swiger References: <1075796985.964405.22320.nullmailer@sinanica.lg2a.datamax> <402010B4.2000200@mac.com> <20040205020115.GA3204@moo.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040205020115.GA3204@moo.holy.cow> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= cc: Chuck Swiger Subject: Re: SIZE in distinfos causes failure with FETCH_CMD=wget X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 11:11:15 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * parv: > in message , wrote Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav > thusly... > > > Chuck Swiger writes: > > > > > Or a way of setting the maximum bandwidth permitted for fetch to > > > use. > > > > man dummynet > > So, one have to abandon ipf for ipfw? AFAIK you can use ipf as firewall and ipfw for limiting bandwidth. They do not conflict with each other. Best regards, --=20 Jean-Baptiste Quenot http://caraldi.com/jbq/ --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAIiTI9xx3BCMc9gsRAoqZAJ4zdKXTO/AHswHbeIaP5yhjCtkorwCeNuaz SERDvqVVyuVIuljpP7/Mv8s= =5TWa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--