From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 16:58:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149741065678 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D77B8FC0A for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 6B3F1191A77; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:58:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mA9GuxRo035788; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:56:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.6/Submit) id mA9GuxS2035787; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:56:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 17:56:59 +0100 To: blauwirbel@gmail.com Message-ID: <20081109165659.GA35617@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mail-Followup-To: blauwirbel@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20081107214438.GA27376@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <200811091637.mA9Gbb5t034814@saturn.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200811091637.mA9Gbb5t034814@saturn.kn-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] first tests of qemu svn r5646 on FreeBSD - usb still slow, bsd-user doesn't build, some warnings... X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:58:28 -0000 On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 05:37:37PM +0100, I wrote: > In article you write: > >On 11/7/08, Juergen Lock wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I just prepared another experimental emulators/qemu-devel port update, > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20081107.patch > >> I haven't tested it that much yet (you are welcome to help there! :) > >> but so far didn't notice much changes compared to last time (r5499), > >> usb is still slow with my Linux 2.6.26 guest (probably to be expected, > >> nothing committed there since.) > > > >The patch is against a bunch of patches, which makes it hard to see > >what has really changed. Could you make an updated set of patches > >available somewhere? At least osdep.c and qemu-char.c patches look > >reasonable enough to be committed. > > > I'll add a shar of the 20081107 qemu-devel port's files/*patch* below, > (yes most of these probably shouldn't be merged... The ones named *-patch > are conditionally applied depending on user-set OPTIONS.) > > Oh and btw the osdep.c patch was already posted here, see > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-10/msg00038.html > > >> In other news: The new sparc64-bsd-user target doesn't build because > >> SYSCALL_G7RFLAG and SYSCALL_G2RFLAG are undefined, and I noticed a few > >> warnings that may be interesting: > > > >The attached patch should fix the undefined flag problem, please test. > > Nope, still two of them left at line 219ff. :) > > Here comes the shar: > > # This is a shell archive. Save it in a file, remove anything before > # this line, and then unpack it by entering "sh file". Note, it may > # create directories; files and directories will be owned by you and > # have default permissions. > # > # This archive contains: > # > # files/ > # files/cdrom-dma-patch > # files/patch-90_security > # files/patch-CVE-2008-0928 > # files/patch-CVE-2008-4539 > # files/patch-Makefile > # files/patch-aa > # files/patch-ac > # files/patch-audio-4 > # files/patch-audio-sdlaudio.c > # files/patch-bc > # files/patch-bd > # files/patch-be > # files/patch-bf > # files/patch-bg > # files/patch-block.c > # files/patch-bsdusb.patch > # files/patch-bt > # files/patch-configure > # files/patch-cpu-exec.c > # files/patch-emulate-aio > # files/patch-exec-all.h > # files/patch-exec.c > # files/patch-fbsd > # files/patch-fix_bsd_user_fbsd ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ooops, ignore this one, leftover from testing... (And btw you can ignore the 0 byte ones too, they were just for generating diffs easier.) Sorry, Juergen