From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue May 25  7:21:36 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A8B15783
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 25 May 1999 07:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id QAA94272;
	Tue, 25 May 1999 16:21:27 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Khaled Daham <khaled@mailbox.telia.net>
Cc: Sergey <serge69@nym.alias.net>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ?
References: <Pine.BSI.3.95.990525121149.4656C-100000@mailbox.telia.net>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 25 May 1999 16:21:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: Khaled Daham's message of "Tue, 25 May 1999 12:31:55 +0200 (CEST)"
Message-ID: <xzplnedkz6i.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Khaled Daham <khaled@mailbox.telia.net> writes:
> And maybe if folks like mike smith and jkh could have pointed out the fact
> that Sergey should have looked in the handbook for an answer on how to
> debug and submit a proper error_report (imho this issue should be
> faq'ified too) , then we probably would have not seen all this flaming, or

"should be faqified"? Before giving us advice on what to put in the
FAQ, it might do well to check what's already there, in section 13 of
the FAQ list and section 22 of the handbook.

DES (author of FAQ entries 13.13 and 13.15)
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message