Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:34:53 +0200
From:      Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>
To:        Carlos Ferreira <carlosmf.pt@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, John Jasen <jjasen@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: fastforward/routing: a 3 million packet-per-second system?
Message-ID:  <CAPS9%2BStvHfB993zVUprmJQeUEBtCvUrrczity4B%2BCyhUBmMDgA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJpYY6XhbPdyRruGM%2B0aQaidAmejAzxbxdEMmCjEXC%2BHP9ZBKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <53CE80DD.9090109@gmail.com> <20140722174117.GC43962@funkthat.com> <53CEAF40.7030406@gmail.com> <CAJpYY6XhbPdyRruGM%2B0aQaidAmejAzxbxdEMmCjEXC%2BHP9ZBKQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, it shows how easily one can saturate the link. Just use more ports,
the will be saturated as well.

The problem though is that netmap requires that one implements the
forwarding "logic" I think.

Best regards
Andreas


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Carlos Ferreira <carlosmf.pt@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think the results presented at the paper are regarding one port sending
> or receiving at 14.88Mpps. Using several ports at the same time will surely
> give much lower results. But then again, if one wants 8, 16, 24 or even
> more ports at 10Gb/s, then it should look for FPGA implementations.
>
>
> On 22 July 2014 19:36, John Jasen <jjasen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 07/22/2014 01:41 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > John Jasen wrote this message on Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:18 -0400:
> > >> Feedback and/or tips and tricks more than welcome.
> > > You should look at netmap if you really want high PPS routing...
> >
> > Originally, I assumed an interface supporting netmap was required, but
> > the manpage disabuses me of this. Besides, I think the Chelsio cards got
> > netmap recently.
> >
> > I presume either the use of bridge in tools/netmap, or vale-ctl in the
> > same location would start providing me sufficient clue on this?
> > Unfortunately, both seem to be pretty short on verbosity ... More clue
> > is always welcome!
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos Miguel Ferreira
> Researcher at Telecommunications Institute
> Aveiro - Portugal
> Work E-mail - cmf@av.it.pt
> Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf.pt@gmail.com
> LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPS9%2BStvHfB993zVUprmJQeUEBtCvUrrczity4B%2BCyhUBmMDgA>