Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 21:02:45 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Carp and port trunking Message-ID: <DA99FE2F0D69001A95764DA9@[192.168.1.5]> In-Reply-To: <200412112047.57337.max@love2party.net> References: <5599FA52E9B4863293C1B5C0@[192.168.1.5]> <200412112047.57337.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
+-Le 11/12/2004 20:47 +0100, Max Laier a dit :
| On Saturday 11 December 2004 20:26, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|> Hi,
|>
|> I've been wondering, would it be possible to use Carp on two routers in
|> load balancing mode, connected to 2 trunked ports a switch ?
|
| Not entirely sure what you mean. Could you try to draw an ascii "art" of
| what you have in mind?
Oh, hum, will that get you in what I have in mind
outside
| |
+----+ +----+
| R1 |--pfsync--| R2 |
+----+ +----+
\ Carp here /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ / trunk on those 2 ports
+-------------------+
| switch |
+-------------------+
| | | | | | | | | |
customers here
In that case, both routers always work, the switch is sending packets to
one or the other as the ports leading to them are trunked.
Is that clear enough ?
--
Mathieu Arnold
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
iQEVAwUBQbtSaVvROjYJ63c1AQJz7Af/X8gOvYNkSN5kB5IUyU4oTv71KpBhg635
C7eJV5AkVnT8K5NpdeAAsyf6sHHvy9KiI2DbUbQ4XGoMt3gX+d6v9BXca2p7IHQV
KuLbUNaKjGjkWn2anqdH1g9NDDFmDhQ4vduA+jQC6c/siMhRuYUoijj6gJuxtjVY
3M3csJ2Cm6Lz1bf5XjPwn2TeLldquITEnOAc0/9XwRHkLfwgiWS8jz2uwLMNWdnV
1wbjEMgeaIcWUudfSgtytOmFrTHO9aHC4u4kAFnYCHwVUtTT+o5/UPZGVN98AEze
qIZVAGGfzHRGCN/WJud3kHaxCud4QncZ/DiEkFRX2Wcumcol3kj9bA==
=OhvQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DA99FE2F0D69001A95764DA9>