From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 29 21:26:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0267A37B401 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CBD43F85 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:26:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h4U4QHmE002694 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 11:26:18 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA10467; Fri, 30 May 2003 11:27:55 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 11:27:55 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200305300427.LAA10467@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> X-Authentication-Warning: banyan.cs.ait.ac.th: on set sender to on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th using -f From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <20030528110038-184800041> (FBSD_User@a1poweruser.com) References: <20030528110038-184800041> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: Re: ipfw and statefull rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 04:26:22 -0000 > For the max in firewall > protection you should use IPFILTER/IPNAT the other Firewall that is > included with FBSD. IPFW2 is over bloated with functions which are > so special purpose that no one uses. I know the FBSD manual kind of > infers that ipfw is the preferred firewall but it really is not, > those in the know use IPFILTER/IPNAT because it is so much easier to > get stateful protection for your lan machines. OK, I have been a good boy, read the ipf documentation, until I found out that FreeBSD+ipf+bridge does not work. So... Olivier