From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 10:42:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D85490E for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x22a.google.com (mail-ee0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAF502882 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b45so1782963eek.29 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:42:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=k+8H5KcQPKASwssQEE5L1rnsr8x+HHHmSQJbcLsWw+E=; b=FTd6IcS4JYtm7gs2ZUtpIdX8FKY+IRgPooOeYi/LBAZrXqP8mm0cUw2MhpWrG+7tsQ Riid1cTQICoDz3Z31ynKdgnpl13kiPBH5WEb6MfPOdTBDxUGBC7KRZzjUpwhcqWEHrbV Nq71slRuuwjZSgTFlH7wXpKo1wD669iXjGZsZ3xohbSZDxyGx8VnRPYE/CBxd0mPIJbd AtOb1Vj7WMoDghl1iH+QIu6MK1h0hg87uNlqZaWUnYIhBtfB1aDx3xjmf8x7ugAWt+ko NQkJ4eH3rd2AdOdhz+HzMlarFpFbVyNOWNTMas52DTz7w1vn10nCe+7BugN/ZmXKDb+S Rv7Q== X-Received: by 10.14.3.9 with SMTP id 9mr1334084eeg.72.1381488162221; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([178.150.115.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r48sm113204865eev.14.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mikolaj Golub Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:42:39 +0300 From: Mikolaj Golub To: Pete French Subject: Re: hast and zfs trim possibly causing some problems in 9.2 Message-ID: <20131011104238.GQ44942@gmail.com> References: <20131010180936.GP44942@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, killing@multiplay.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:42:44 -0000 On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:27:36AM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > If the device on the secondary node does not supports DELETE, but the > > device on the primary does, HAST will report to ZFS that DELETE > > succeeded (although it failed on the secondary), and ZFS will not > > disable TRIM. Pete, isn't this your case? > > Afraid not, both machines are running normal "spinning rust" hard > drives as the actual storage layer, so there is nothing TRIM capable > anywhere. > > I didnt get much chnace to look at this yesterday, but am looking at the logs > again now, and I see these messages right up to the time the machine > fell over. That machine had been up for a long time, and it was still logging > these messages, so it looks very much as if ZFS did not stop trying to > issue the TRIM. You showed only "Remote request failed" errors from your logs. Do you have "Local request failed" errors too? -- Mikolaj Golub