From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 08:54:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DA637B401 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458FF43FAF for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:54:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from diz@linuxpowered.com) Received: from linuxpowered.com (12-238-50-170.client.attbi.com[12.238.50.170](untrusted sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <200307081554370150099dh3e> (Authid: jdisnard); Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:54:37 +0000 Message-ID: <3F0AE924.2070206@linuxpowered.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 10:54:12 -0500 From: Jon Disnard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <3F05E851.1020201@linuxpowered.com> <20030707204147.GA59055@lethargic.dyndns.org> <20030707.212640.34583015.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20030707.212640.34583015.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: kopts@astro.psu.edu cc: mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wireless card X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 15:54:41 -0000 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20030707204147.GA59055@lethargic.dyndns.org> > Jason Hunt writes: > : On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:49:21PM -0500, Jon Disnard wrote: > : > Avoid the Lucent cards like plauge. They are of major suck. > : > : What's so bad about Lucent cards? I've been using them for the last > : couple of years w/o any big issues. I'll admit that I've not tried anything > : other than Lucent (ie: Cisco/Prism), but I don't see what is wrong with > : them. > > Lucent cards are decent, just that the current driver has some > problems... Yes this is true, and I should have been more correct originally. I meant that the cards are of major suck because of driver weirdness, and the lack of hostap mode. Although, I'm still frustrated with the if_wi.c but not as frustrated as i look at the HCF code. Given the above, i tell people to forget their cards based on the Hermes chips (lucent, orinoco, etc), and go with atheros or intersil based card. -Jon