From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jun 1 13: 1:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from jane.lfn.org (www.lfn.org [209.16.92.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E431E14D55 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 13:00:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from caj@lfn.org) Received: (qmail 29934 invoked by uid 100); 1 Jun 1999 20:00:53 -0000 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 15:00:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Craig Johnston To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: root's shell Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Root's shell is csh. This is a bug. Is there any reason for this besides tradition? Why even bother with csh anymore? If we're gonna give root a shell with job control, why not ksh, or anything but csh? Isn't it time for csh to go? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message