From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 19 14:36:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE77426; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloud.theravensnest.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FB7D4A; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from c124.sec.cl.cam.ac.uk (c124.sec.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.18.124]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t5JEa7os067535 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:36:08 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r268137 - head/sys/sys From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:36:07 +0100 Cc: Hans Petter Selasky , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "src-committers@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <89A0CAC4-60D3-4E4F-B23E-EC16DDE0460D@FreeBSD.org> References: <201407020845.s628jRG5031824@svn.freebsd.org> <5BE3492F-86A0-4CE3-A27C-8DB5EB662C64@FreeBSD.org> <5583F2C9.1030409@selasky.org> <1EB851FC-CA78-4A7B-BE5D-4F050C61A14C@FreeBSD.org> <558403C4.4040500@selasky.org> <55841BF3.8010205@selasky.org> <74BE6DD6-1C0F-4E59-8913-CFCE7DD744CB@FreeBSD.org> <55842746.5040105@selasky.org> To: araujo@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:36:10 -0000 On 19 Jun 2015, at 15:32, Marcelo Araujo = wrote: >=20 > Maybe would be a good idea run an 'exp run' with this patch? Just to = double check if any port will break, although after you rename, I don't = believe it will conflict anymore, however an 'exp run' would show you = it. It=E2=80=99s probably worth doing, though unfortunately the failure mode = for the previous breakage was to silently generate the wrong code in = some cases and so may not have shown up in an exp run. David