Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:16:43 -0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
To:        Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: something wrong with dmesg?
Message-ID:  <4F3D804B.8000008@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAE-mSO%2BCQqzEFUbuyfb5=oC0iwr0TNEDjbmKTXUYN7Fk%2Ber8qA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4F3CC54B.7080402@freebsd.org> <CAE-mSO%2BCQqzEFUbuyfb5=oC0iwr0TNEDjbmKTXUYN7Fk%2Ber8qA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/16/12 1:27 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 16 February 2012 12:58, Julian Elischer<julian@freebsd.org>  wrote:
>> I just noticed that lately in 9.x and maybe 8-Stable, dmesg seems to return
>> nothing if
>> there is active logging going on. I saw someone else refer to this as well.
>>
>> Has this been reported?
> Didn't we have this for years? I cannot recall there was a difference to the
> current behavior since 8.x or 7.x (or even 6.x).
> kern.msgbuf includes messages sent with syslog, and if they dominate
> then you might get empty dmesg output. By default it skips non-kernel
> (or rather those messages which doesn't use BSD syslog format)
> messages, and you can include them using dmesg -a.
>
I expect to see the output from all kernel 'printf' statements in dmesg.
they were definitely not turning up for me last week, but if I tried 
again,
there would be contents,




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3D804B.8000008>