From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 08:30:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E905A1065687 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7188FC21 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so602916rvf.43 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:30:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CZBrp5tALHJUWFqDboaT8eQR2JxO5062QAt0v5n6Rog=; b=spDoyzopB/ouCJnOyijZP9A556VtQPlzFMcnveuWPjbkQ0ENRuEos4rYATATsYuaav i9hi1cwyQPRGJoQmviSegzuSWkT0ZyprWH69fxTC3mS4oRhVNQ0dG4Xa3DYHnqDWhimp SC/ber5qdkdpmq9YFutTtaXQzSj+XNSnIdRw4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=MdgBowasygSHCGHDWtJlmTGoSxaA44Z7iLFyJT+16KWvCl2SvSRwMY5ZNZFS4UxG16 NuTszwphBXJQwL31lU3HtYbjWDVlQbjFuXHm/29jMtz8Sam0pzEj9vbE2yWFrz83DxDc h4rjsPfkoc2Jx3RaaJZcRvUJ4DFoQjBsZNCBk= Received: by 10.141.76.21 with SMTP id d21mr4627605rvl.270.1219219517127; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm1788379rvb.1.2008.08.20.01.05.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m7K835fh088867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:03:05 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id m7K834kQ088866; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:03:04 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:03:04 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Garrett Cooper Message-ID: <20080820080304.GA87443@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <7d6fde3d0808192345j3c6b595el2f60a21c8353e9ec@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7d6fde3d0808192345j3c6b595el2f60a21c8353e9ec@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issues with msk driver on 8-CURRENT amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:30:09 -0000 On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:45:48PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hi Pyun! > I know it's been a while since I responded, but after > reinstalling my system recently I noticed that the issue I mentioned > almost a year ago > (http://www.mavetju.org/mail/view_thread.php?list=freebsd-net&id=2570821&thread=yes) > with my Marvell chipset card has once again returned. In the interim I > was using x86, and I didn't suffer from any of the issues I have again > on x64, and I was using XP x64 but now I've switched over to Vista x64 > on my client box. > Subsequently, the only thing that's really changed on my system > is that I'm using CPUTYPE=nocona (for my Core 2 Quad proc). > I'm using the 7-RELENG kernel right now (and not really enjoying > it, but it works -- yay?), but I'd like to help resolve the issue with > msk under CURRENT with x64 and my chipset. > Standing by awaiting marching orders with tcpdump, netcat, and > pciconf at my side to help debug the issue :). Would you please explain your issues with more information? For instance, Can you see a valid link is established by msk(4)? Did both ends agree on established speed/duplex? What speed/duplex was chosen by msk(4)? Forcing speed/duplex have any effects? Turning off checksum offload or TSO have any effects? Did you use back-to-back connection without switch? tcpdump data for a broken connection might be help too. > Thanks, > -Garrett -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon