From owner-freebsd-security  Sun Nov  5  1: 6:35 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [198.78.58.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B25D37B4C5
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun,  5 Nov 2000 01:06:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from tim@localhost)
	by shell.futuresouth.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA08501
	for freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 03:06:30 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 03:06:30 -0600
From: Tim Tsai <tim@futuresouth.com>
To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: pine 4.30 improvements
Message-ID: <20001105030630.A8453@futuresouth.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011041356140.38184-100000@achilles.silby.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011041356140.38184-100000@achilles.silby.com>; from silby@silby.com on Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 02:12:35PM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 02:12:35PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> However, if they keep moving in this direction, it seems likely that pine
> will be able to be considered safe within a release or two.

  They've been saying that for years.

  Tim


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message