From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 15 23:22:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F5E16A412 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8623313C428 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (zion.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0FMw2Lp037666; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:58:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:39:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <87A429B7-46CD-426B-A56F-07D57F2E769E@patpro.net> <20070115165059.GP4945@poupinou.org> In-Reply-To: <20070115165059.GP4945@poupinou.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701151739.46792.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.1]); Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:58:03 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/2453/Mon Jan 15 15:22:48 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Subject: Re: acpi ok but cpufreq not supporting my CPUs X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:22:50 -0000 On Monday 15 January 2007 11:51, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 10:02:06PM +0100, Patrick Proniewski wrote: > > est0: on cpu0 > > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr a1e0a1e06000a1e > > device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 > > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > > > > (same for cpu1/2/3) > > > > Is there anything I can do to make "est" work with the sossaman CPU ? > > > > thanks in advance, > > > > It's not possible, AFAIK, to build a static table for your processor, > and in that case, we have to use an ACPI table in order to compute > a custom table. If such information is not available, then there > is little hope to make est working, being an SMP problem or not is > not your problem I'm afraid. It maybe possible you forgot a > BIOS option somewhat so such this configuration will be generated > and exposed via ACPI though, or maybe you have to upgrade to a > newer BIOS. One thing we can do is at least support the two modes encoded into the MSR (the highest and lowest IIRC). I think I have a patch laying around somewhere to do that. -- John Baldwin