From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 25 7:31:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailg.telia.com (mailg.telia.com [194.22.194.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F8E15765 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 07:31:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from khaled@mailbox.telia.net) Received: from mailbox.telia.net (khaled@mailbox.telia.net [194.237.170.234]) by mailg.telia.com (8.8.5/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA12531; Tue, 25 May 1999 16:31:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (khaled@localhost) by mailbox.telia.net (8.9.1/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA28134; Tue, 25 May 1999 16:31:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 16:31:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Khaled Daham To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Sergey , Mike Smith , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 25 May 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Khaled Daham writes: > > And maybe if folks like mike smith and jkh could have pointed out the fact > > that Sergey should have looked in the handbook for an answer on how to > > debug and submit a proper error_report (imho this issue should be > > faq'ified too) , then we probably would have not seen all this flaming, or > > "should be faqified"? Before giving us advice on what to put in the > FAQ, it might do well to check what's already there, in section 13 of > the FAQ list and section 22 of the handbook. Ah I missed the FAQ entry (Its fairly new). sorry! btw is there really an us/you side ? > DES (author of FAQ entries 13.13 and 13.15) > -- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no > /Khaled, Telia Network Services Mail: khaled@telia.net Cell: 070-6785492 Work: 08-4567281 :hacker: /n./ [originally, someone who makes furniture with an axe] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message