From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 6 18:09:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2908A16A417; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3647F13C43E; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47811967.3050906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:09:43 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <20080106141157.I105@fledge.watson.org> <20080106170452.L105@fledge.watson.org> <47811336.4060605@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When will ZFS become stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:09:50 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> What you appear to be still missing is that ZFS also causes memory >> exhaustion panics when run on 32-bit Solaris. > > Citation needed. I'm interested. > Reports on the zfs-discuss mailing list. Kris