From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 18:59:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C3A37B401; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4CF43FA3; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:59:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1])h411x7Y56504; Thu, 1 May 2003 10:59:07 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) In-Reply-To: <20030501002206.GA30097@madman.celabo.org> References: <200304301754.h3UHsJ21004574@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030430181603.GD84302@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030501002206.GA30097@madman.celabo.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 Emacs/21.3 X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20030322(IM144) Lines: 19 From: Makoto Matsushita To: nectar@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 10:59:05 +0900 Message-Id: <20030501105905M.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: ru@FreeBSD.org cc: mark@grondar.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: gordont@gnf.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org cc: markm@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kerberos 5 (was Re: cvs commit: src/release ...) X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 01:59:14 -0000 nectar> Merging Kerberos 5 with the other crypto bits brings it down nectar> to two, which is quite a blessing. (I really wouldn't mind nectar> seeing base and crypto merged either.) It sounds that Kerberos5 is now combined into 'crypto' distribution, but: nectar> 5.1-RELEASE (and probably the rest of the 5.x series) will nectar> have Kerberos 5 in the base system. That being the case, nectar> please, let us not have it as a seperate distribution, and let nectar> us have it built by default. It sounds that Kerberos5 is now combined into 'base' distribution. Which is the true one? -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita