From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Aug 28 18:51:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA00751
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 18:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA00741
          for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 18:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA21255; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 18:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: James FitzGibbon <james@ican.net>
cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Should this port go in ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Aug 1996 21:19:44 EDT."
             <Pine.BSI.3.95.960828211558.26870B-100000@expresslane.ca> 
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 18:51:22 -0700
Message-ID: <21253.841283482@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> The question is, does a port of a program like this (which has an
> admittedly small target audience) belong in the ports collection.

I believe so.

> Certainly it would benefit anyone using an Ascend terminal server, and
> since we're all trying to push FreeBSD to ISPs, I feel it could be very
> helpful.

I agree.  I've probably seen about a dozen self-rolled ports of
radiusd running on the various FreeBSD ISPs I have accounts with.

					Jordan