Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:50:47 +0100 From: Johannes Lundberg <johalun0@gmail.com> To: Greg V <greg@unrelenting.technology> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some updates to Wayland stuff Message-ID: <CAECmPws4M%2BxuaGbbBHeGpA%2BDaa8g16oKSkGgx=xf-U1eqTS58g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <d85a04cb-cfb5-df96-814f-db1ede592125@unrelenting.technology> References: <CAECmPwvHKnfukzvoZj_in5BGNEB3jJNZOaTYDKJ93WUjNhGRMw@mail.gmail.com> <d85a04cb-cfb5-df96-814f-db1ede592125@unrelenting.technology>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Greg V via freebsd-x11 <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> wrote: > > My ports fork is https://github.com/myfreeweb/freebsd-ports-dank =E2=80= =94 it > includes gnome-3.26 and plasma5, a lot of Wayland and Vulkan things, and > other random patches. > Hi! Good job! I've been swamped with other stuff lately so haven't been able to spend a lot of time on graphics but that should change now. We should have a common repository for all Wayland stuff. I suggest yours := ) Maybe now with flavors we can get wayland enabled gtk30 in ports as well? > Sadly, the ports maintained by x11@ might as well be maintained by no-rep= ly@ > =E2=80=94 I've received ABSOLUTELY NO REACTION from x11@ to the libinput = patch, in > almost TWO MONTHS. The Mesa 17.2.x patch by jbeich@ was also completely > ignored for a long long time =E2=80=94 and in the end, a different (!) pa= tch doing > the same thing was committed. Yeah, tell me about it. Weston 2 never made it into the ports tree at all, hopefully Weston 3 will... Or maybe we should just switch to ravenports if that's easier to work with?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAECmPws4M%2BxuaGbbBHeGpA%2BDaa8g16oKSkGgx=xf-U1eqTS58g>