From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Apr 22 22:30:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA07655 for chat-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 22:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA07648 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 22:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA02442; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 22:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199704230529.WAA02442@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: mike allison cc: Wes Peters - Softweyr LLC , jgrosch@sirius.com, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Price of FreeBSD (was On Holy Wars...) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Apr 1997 21:41:29 PDT." <335EE479.482AB1F2@konnections.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 22:29:37 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Well, In the West Coast, we our sad state of public transport to Ford 8) Cheers, Amancio >From The Desk Of mike allison : > Wes: > > I have to differ.... > > The subway system in New York was initiated in the late 1800's and most > the others were around long before the 2nd WW and WAY before IKE. The > reason we don't have inner city mass transit is that no one uses it in > the west. Their too wed to their cars. The east coast is closer and > less distance oriented, most things could be had in the neighborhood and > the majority of the people were immigrants who had a much more social > and socialist background and could appreciate the utility of mass > transit. > > Pre & Post WWII we had a booming interstate train system which fell > apart thanks to the highway system... and the ready availability of > cheap gasoline... > > I also believe the term Info Superhiway was around before '92.... could > be wrong... > > -Mike > > Wes Peters - Softweyr LLC wrote: > > > > > Agree. The mass transit system in NYC is the best in America which is'nt > > > saying much. > > > > Not really, both the Boston and D.C. systems are better IMHO. You can, > > however, count on your fingers the number of U.S. cities with working > > public transportation systems that truly cover the urban area. Even > > Seattle and Portland (OR) have some gaping holes in their coverage. I > > think the list probably includes NYC, Boston, D.C., Chicago, and San > > Francisco. Maybe Atlanta. > > > > In case anyone wants to know, this was pretty much a conscious decision > > made by the Eisenhower administrations; they wanted to build the > > Interstate highway system and financed it at the cost of pulic > > transportation. The "intellectual" leader of this transportation > > revolution was none other than Al Gore Sr. This is where the campaign > > phrase "information superhighway" came from. > > > > -- > > "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" > > > > Wes Peters Softweyr L LC > > http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.c om