From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Oct 10 8:50:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3BF37B401 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 08:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost.ds.psu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f9AFo9Z02586; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:50:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200110101550.f9AFo9Z02586@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Use of the UNIX Trademark In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Oct 2001 22:37:17 PDT." <003301c14e28$f5ed1be0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> From: dochawk@psu.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:50:09 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >It's a damn shame that the UNIX term was ever got into this mess to begin >with but what do you expect from AT&T. there are many things to blame AT&T for, but I don't think that this is one of them. AT&T's hands were so tied by assorted (usually silly) antitrust rulings and issues that it very frequently could not even *do* the rational thing. I'm amazed that they managed to get unix into the wild in the first place . . . -- What part of "non-negotiable" didn't you understand? /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message