From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 6 15:33:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA15106566B for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0758FC16 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekc1 with SMTP id c1so2032810eek.13 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:33:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BzKWGVFb3NSJYnEPhHkXgRA7kow3cbfXPiKeIuUU7QI=; b=s+PfY4TS495KiXqCWVdQy/Na+BpwohSkv06mtUZPAUVMatAYrp2R/Y7FMn2ECgrG8U GHiZASvnceqGDhC89+KoLmI8iDsezINgMMPRs/H+FEs2YPpLiEZOZKp18JBF2yczZifS yVpa3Bs0ISglSCeAvhaZlttyMuyDvjlxH+twE= Received: by 10.213.105.81 with SMTP id s17mr2564506ebo.36.1323185582919; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:33:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fg16sm8592791bkb.16.2011.12.06.07.33.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:33:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:32:59 +0000 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111206153259.501d81bb@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20111206095325.66342106566C@hub.freebsd.org> <20111206122146.3002664c@gumby.homeunix.com> <20111206134554.44298ce7@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Linux compatibility with more than one Linux installed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:33:05 -0000 On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:04:59 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:45 AM, RW wrote: > > But what I was getting at was the statement "linuxulator is a Linux > > kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel module" which I'm guessing now > > you didn't mean literally. > > FreeBSD handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/linuxemu-advanced.html > > "In effect, there is a Linux kernel in the FreeBSD kernel; ..." Clearly the author of that article doesn't agree with you or he wouldn't have written "In effect". If your statement had been: "linuxulator is effectively a Linux kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel", then it wouldn't have been plain wrong. > So, if you define a Linux kernel as "every thing written by Linus and > his followers", then I'm wrong; but if you agree that "Android is not > GNU but it does run a Linux kernel", then I'm probably right. Android is based on fork of Linux, it contains real Linux code. All you could argue from that is that the linuxulator could be called Linux if it were based on Linux code.