Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:50:13 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: idprio(1) broken Message-ID: <5A437AE5.4080104@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <92a254fb-8066-4930-e4ad-f4fedb0e84d0@FreeBSD.org> References: <5A421212.4040703@grosbein.net> <5A4213DC.20508@grosbein.net> <92a254fb-8066-4930-e4ad-f4fedb0e84d0@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26.12.2017 18:37, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> It is expected that idprio'd bzip2 get no CPU time at all and each of "normal" bzip2's >>> get ~100% of single CPU core for such setup. >> >> This works as expected for stable/10. > > Seems to work as expected on head as well. I've updated my old stable/11 to recent stable/11 r327192 and problem's gone. Sorry for noise.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A437AE5.4080104>