From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Jan 12 08:31:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA04248
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 08:31:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from whqvax.picker.com (whqvax.picker.com [144.54.1.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id IAA04240
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 08:31:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ct.picker.com by whqvax.picker.com with SMTP;
          Sun, 12 Jan 1997 11:30:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from elmer.ct.picker.com ([144.54.57.34]) by ct.picker.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA00551; Sun, 12 Jan 97 11:30:28 EST
Received: by elmer.ct.picker.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id LAA16259; Sun, 12 Jan 1997 11:29:01 -0500
Message-Id: <Mutt.19970112112901.rhh@elmer.ct.picker.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 11:29:01 -0500
From: rhh@ct.picker.com (Randall Hopper)
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: workman-atapi port - should I reupload it?
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.56
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

     In 2.1 there was a workman-atapi port that worked & continues to work
great for me (I'm on 2.2-ALPHA now).

     Now I've been keeping this port around because it mysteriously
disappeared from ftp.freebsd.org a few versions back for some reason.  It'd
be nice if we could roll this port back into the distribution.  Should I
just re-upload it to incoming?

     The reason I ask is that a number of folks have contacted me recently
via e-mail having found my name in the mailing list archives as having a
copy of the workman-atapi.tar.gz port and I've been shuffling these copies
behind the scenes.  No big problem, but there's enough need I think the
port needs to be more publicly accessible.

Thanks,

Randall Hopper