From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 3 14:15:25 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA13744 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:15:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.kar.net (n178.cdialup.kar.net [195.178.130.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA13716; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 14:15:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kushn@mail.kar.net) Received: from localhost (volodya@localhost) by mail.kar.net (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA34445; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 00:13:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kushn@mail.kar.net) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 00:13:51 +0200 (EET) From: Vladimir Kushnir X-Sender: volodya@kushnir.kiev.ua To: Wiliam Woods cc: FBSD_QUESTIONS , FBSD_CURRENT Subject: Re: pgcc-1.1.1 In-Reply-To: <005501be3737$d091d620$f301040a@c063.beaverton.stream.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Wiliam Woods wrote: > Anyone here useing pgcc-1.1.1 as their compiler of choice, to replace gcc? I > have been debating playing with this on my "spare" system. > Any reports from someone useing this, good or bad? Not sure if I'd like to replace gcc, especially for kernel, but I'm using pgcc (both C, and C++, and g77) for userland here, mostly as a matter of speed-up (yep, I know that's not what egcs is intended for, but all the same some of us need fast code). Works fine. Only question: does anybody know why Linux cross-compiled (within emulation) code runs _much_ faster? > > Thanks, > > Bill > > Regards, Vladimir ===========================|======================= Vladimir Kushnir | kushn@mail.kar.net, | Powered by FreeBSD kushnir@ap3.bitp.kiev.ua | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message