From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 17:36:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB56106566C for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:36:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841A68FC1A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2292463bwz.3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:36:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:date:to:cc :subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GM2a78qHcNyFqc282/ooHQ0Uhl9PHyV1Jc8R77ekHsE=; b=hR6tP7JjQMKCTUebCLYIiKd5J7VwvUMv9Ccs3aW7x2lscPCc7kqDtUNE9UcpXQkOvV XyzMAHwY+iJ9YI0sW3qKg+FIxd+o646t4wROSKlEjNEZJ2VI4JfpMeU9LnXimJXvLOpS AhX5yo3v9CIcIgmJKAksVOT0sHw2ImlrD1b6A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=x3EWK5m26CVnD7+Mp1APWqA6ZBgMFI2byilq+kbVYPmVuCWOaurXClTqFlrvaSCJtv 8vkchIv5bI5HyxJXmoDAwjYuipgeXowJCXw2GZpxf+6RNw0ZwtHmxP/zzp8UmjoJZ/pV PYX/nuIHAPN01MknInA1MauTi0JBDa4riK0D4= Received: by 10.204.142.207 with SMTP id r15mr1297996bku.134.1269538586301; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([174.35.1.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm975050bwz.2.2010.03.25.10.36.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:35:56 -0700 From: Pyun YongHyeon Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:35:56 -0700 To: Nenhum_de_Nos Message-ID: <20100325173556.GA1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <5f0d2fca99441437799bc5d7f55d6ea9.squirrel@lamneth> <20100324010107.GM1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <3e164e2fc77415a67bd7d22e9c51168b.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <20100324214230.GT1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100324215827.GU1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100324231833.GX1278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <35a626b67a1556071f4c76498214581d.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <35a626b67a1556071f4c76498214581d.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10Mbps+ throughput usb based ethernet recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:36:28 -0000 On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:22:32PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > On Wed, March 24, 2010 20:18, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:58:27PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:42:30PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 06:16:21PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, March 23, 2010 22:01, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >> > > >> > [...] > >> > > >> > > >> Just adding info, I keep getting these outputs from ifconfig: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> ue0: flags=8843 metric 0 > >> mtu > >> > > >> 1500 > >> > > >> ether 00:11:50:e7:39:e9 > >> > > >> inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > >> > > >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > >> > > >> status: active > >> > > >> and: > >> > > >> ue0: flags=8843 metric 0 > >> mtu > >> > > >> 1500 > >> > > >> ether 00:11:50:e7:39:e9 > >> > > >> inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > >> > > >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > >> > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> > > >> status: active > >> > > >> > >> > > >> and this keeps repeating over and over. iperf and on the other > >> end an > >> > > > > >> > > > Maybe this is real problem. It seems PHY have trouble to establish > >> > > > link. This is FreeBSD stable/8 right? > >> > > > >> > > yes. on 7.2 is even worse :( > >> > > > >> > > > Would you show me the output of "devinfo -rv| grep phy"? > >> > > > >> > > /usr/home/matheus]$ devinfo -rv| grep phy > >> > > ukphy0 pnpinfo oui=0x1e model=0x14 rev=0x9 at > >> phyno=1 > >> > > >> > axe(4) requires correct resolved speed/link status reported from > >> > PHY driver. Otherwise it will incorrectly reprogram some registers > >> > and this can result in unexpected result. > >> > The OUI 0x1e from the above looks odd and I'm not aware of any PHY > >> > vendors that reports such OUI. Because FreeBSD does not strictly > >> > follows OUI decoding defined by IEEE it's also possible that > >> > FreeBSD incorrectly showed wrong OUI. What is your USB ethernet > >> > controller model? > >> > > >> > >> Please try this patch and let me know the output on your console. > >> It will show you "XXX ID1 = 0xYYYY, ID2 = 0xZZZZ". > >> > > > > Use this patch instead of previous one. > > I applied the patch, and recompiled just the module. no good, then mii > module also recompiled. this time I can ping from inside the > freebsd-current vm (vbox) using bridged networking (notebook ethernet nfe > adapter) connected to this axe device (this on 8-stable native). > > ping runs, but yet looses packets: > The patch just prints some register information which could be used to track down PHY issues. So it's expected one as the patch has no functional changes. > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=125 ttl=64 time=0.507 ms > load: 0.54 cmd: ping 15245 [select] 125.96r 0.01u 0.00s 0% 1372k > 95/126 packets received (75.4%) 0.450 min / 1.359 avg / 51.108 max > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=126 ttl=64 time=0.499 ms > > but I see no messages on console/dmesg/messages file: > > Mar 25 14:04:40 darkside kernel: ue0: link state changed to DOWN > Mar 25 14:04:40 darkside kernel: ue0: link state changed to UP > Mar 25 14:06:17 darkside kernel: ue0: promiscuous mode enabled > Mar 25 14:06:35 darkside kernel: ue0: promiscuous mode disabled > Mar 25 14:15:59 darkside kernel: ugen1.4: at usbus1 > (disconnected) > Mar 25 14:15:59 darkside kernel: axe0: at uhub1, port 3, addr 4 > (disconnected) > Mar 25 14:15:59 darkside kernel: ukphy0: detached > Mar 25 14:15:59 darkside kernel: miibus1: detached > Mar 25 14:16:00 darkside kernel: nfe0: link state changed to DOWN > Mar 25 14:16:19 darkside kernel: ugen1.4: at usbus1 > Mar 25 14:16:19 darkside kernel: axe0: 2.00/0.01, addr 4> on usbus1 > Mar 25 14:16:19 darkside kernel: axe0: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x01 > Mar 25 14:16:20 darkside kernel: miibus1: on axe0 > Mar 25 14:16:20 darkside kernel: ukphy0: interface> PHY 1 on miibus1 > Mar 25 14:16:20 darkside kernel: ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, > 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto > Mar 25 14:16:20 darkside kernel: ue0: on axe0 > Mar 25 14:16:20 darkside kernel: ue0: Ethernet address: 00:11:50:e7:39:e9 > Mar 25 14:16:21 darkside kernel: ue0: link state changed to DOWN > Mar 25 14:16:23 darkside kernel: nfe0: link state changed to UP > Mar 25 14:17:06 darkside kernel: ue0: link state changed to UP > > do I need to recompile kernel ? (I will as soon as I get home anyway) > Yes, mii(4) should be recompiled to get the register information. Let me know ukphy(4) output after rebuilding kernel.