From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 11 01:11:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A30106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f213.google.com (mail-ew0-f213.google.com [209.85.219.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594768FC0C for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so10066653ewy.14 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:10:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6sstjwu0CPlK09xstt3ZVGrB+Y8np460AlfD/eIPR38=; b=ZW/q2uOWNCFuqdnHTS0Jb0DOgdWG6mNqgjH6Dufad1DuqhfW0XymnYUN+evPkVJFMR 5RZSWtdufGsqPyzE7q5byyZiVpXcZ2r52rSVYtcjdx8NHGJV3SAWRctLQ4iQWIU2S8kf x1KYMVKV9ihxd49DGrmSR00VTKW6Mmlat8T+w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=u2yKgTE+lRYYSP7dQCnbeYHqicDHw+GY6vrQE2iEbueRt+WJ4+9Xcude1fYr78JCET q2IW3+ImwjznyBzvr2D2DLhyO2YhrQh+6ttFh/FG2ga33+vYymcqnt1Ggm4v5KB0niBE h73lEGdEet4YN5hlian9OlmFCfJ5mMAHGy9WM= Received: by 10.213.98.142 with SMTP id q14mr2595683ebn.75.1263171916348; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:05:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm340465ewy.5.2010.01.10.17.05.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:05:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:04:43 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100111010443.3643a8d0@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20100110102102.GA1920@current.Sisis.de> References: <20100110102102.GA1920@current.Sisis.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: must /compat/linux stay in root-fs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:11:07 -0000 On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:21:02 +0100 Matthias Apitz wrote: > Can I safely move the /compat tu /usr/local/compat and do a symlink to > let point /compat --> /usr/local/compat or is there some reason that > linux-f10 ports put all into /compat in root-fs? For me /compat was a symlink to /usr/compat by default. Perhaps it's put there by sysinstall rather than the port.