Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 19:38:25 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@bluelife.at> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org Ports" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RedPorts and restricted distfiles Message-ID: <531CB521.5080700@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <CAE-m3X1i6fKLSe0%2BUvkcj1YyeoVwnrdbi7%2BiDwu1bm012yfE6A@mail.gmail.com> References: <531CA5F7.3040307@gwdg.de> <CAE-m3X1i6fKLSe0%2BUvkcj1YyeoVwnrdbi7%2BiDwu1bm012yfE6A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 09.03.2014 18:54, schrieb Bernhard Fröhlich: > Am 09.03.2014 18:33 schrieb "Rainer Hurling" <rhurlin@gwdg.de>: >> >> I am trying to test an update of astro/xephem, which has a restricted >> distfile. >> >> I tried to svn commit the source file as >> 'distfiles/xephem-3.7.6.tar.gz', but without luck. >> >> The RedPorts script seem to expect the distfile at 'tmp/distfiles'. I >> got this error message: >> >> xephem-3.7.6 because of licensing restrictions, you must manually fetch >> xephem-3.7.6.tar.gz from http://www.clearskyinstitute.com/xephem/, place >> it in /tmp/distfiles and then run make again. >> >> >> Is there any way, one can test ports with restricted distfiles on > RedPorts? >> >> Any help is really appreciated. >> >> Rainer Hurling > > The easiest way to test it is to remove/comment the restricted line and/or > put the file on an additional temporary mirror. Tinderbox uses a distfile > cache that is shared per machine so it's a bit complicated to inject > distfiles there from your build. I uploaded the distfile to my server and commented the restricted and the ignore lines. It seems, that your suggestion works quite well! Many thanks for the quick help, Rainer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?531CB521.5080700>