Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 00:28:04 +0900 From: itojun@iijlab.net To: tech-net@netbsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getaddrinfo() and PF_LOCAL Message-ID: <17251.996766084@itojun.org> In-Reply-To: assar's message of 02 Aug 2001 17:15:30 %2B0200. <5lk80mebn1.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> we had a local discussion within KAME. we do not really like to >> support PF_LOCAL, unless there's clear standard behavior for AF_LOCAL >> case. >I think this is the wrong approach. If we're always going to wait for >a clear and standarized behaviour of something before implementing it, >I'm afraid that this is not going to appear and if there is actually a >standard for it, then it will have been written without the help of >implementation and usage experience. we can probably try it out (if it seems really necessary for us) on KAME tree, but not on *BSD-current nor *BSD official releases. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17251.996766084>