From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon May 15 13:01:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35731D6D352 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 13:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 172657F5; Mon, 15 May 2017 13:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [127.0.1.132]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B29D7804; Mon, 15 May 2017 13:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rm@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: How should we name node-js ports ? To: Rodrigo Osorio , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org References: From: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov Message-ID: <32cbf11f-5ce0-ce16-8c56-c45d585ed2f6@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 15:57:37 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 13:01:17 -0000 Rodrigo Osorio wrote on 05/14/2017 15:16: > Hi, > > I have a bunch of nodejs ports to add, most of them as dependencies, > and I wonder if we can find a naming standard like adding 'node' or > 'node-js' prefix in the name ; I personally prefer 'node'. > > As a result a port who install the node package xxx will be named > 'node-xxx' > > Does it sounds good to you ? > > Thanks for your time, > > -- rodrigo Am I right they will be actually installed with npm? If so, it would make sense to name them npm-, like rubygems installed packages. -- Regards, Ruslan T.O.S. Of Reality