From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 8 18:50:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ralf.artlogix.com (sense-mcglk-240.oz.net [216.39.168.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F2837B405 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:50:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by ralf.artlogix.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62E701B9C9F; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:50:53 -0800 (PST) To: Andrew Reid Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamming FreeBSD lists. References: <87ofk6dnjh.fsf@ralf.artlogix.com> <20020108063723.GA24052@panix.com> <877kqs8h2i.fsf@ralf.artlogix.com> <1010543177.81109.0.camel@aviion.alfred.cx> From: Ken McGlothlen Date: 08 Jan 2002 18:50:53 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1010543177.81109.0.camel@aviion.alfred.cx> Message-ID: <87advo6xv6.fsf@ralf.artlogix.com> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Andrew Reid writes: | D'you seriously think that a spammer is going to /pay/ the FreeBSD Foundation | money for the privilege of spamming? As if they'd pay up! No. I think they'd take their spam elsewhere, though. If not, they've been warned, and they'd lose in court. | That's all well and good, but it doesn't get rid of the problem. Let's | suppose that spammers actually pay. Are we without the inconvenience of the | unwanted advertising? Nup. No, but I'd read a spam if the Foundation got a few hundred thousand dollars for it per occurrence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message