Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 21:23:28 +0100 From: Nicolas Herry <beastieboy@beastieboy.net> To: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Cc: Fernando =?utf-8?Q?Apestegu=C3=ADa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>, User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Testing ports of rust software w/o building rustc Message-ID: <86leohfdfj.fsf@beastieboy.net> In-Reply-To: <42FCFC04-FFB4-41BC-BD1D-009F77A90B65@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> (Paul Mather's message of "Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:50:42 -0500") References: <86h6zajyd0.fsf@beastieboy.net> <CAGwOe2amkTGbbT-kUUBG0woQeP7obBZ8eJV0zHhSUuJL%2BQ-iRA@mail.gmail.com> <86bkpiih05.fsf@beastieboy.net> <42FCFC04-FFB4-41BC-BD1D-009F77A90B65@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> writes: > I got tired, too, of Rust taking many many hours to build, so I > decided to install the ports-mgmt/sccache-overlay port to speed things > up (it extends ccache functionality to Rust software). It helps, plus > you also get a ccache speed boost to those other heavyweight ports > like llvm* and gcc* if you're not already using ccache... Then I'm curious now: why not opt for poudriere-devel (and binary downloads)? Do you need to pass specific options to the compilation of Rust? -- Nicolas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86leohfdfj.fsf>