From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 21:38:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F067106566C; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F29E8FC17; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14so8040368vcb.13 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:38:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=udLYd6FgTx9BvupgMLG7eRQal9SZPVyNWs6vbnLK0bc=; b=Hmb4N5awRJ2XCmMNGDY29/Nd64+FsMc/uf4f5Skh+RHG+LxAlglnMLbAmA/Bkb3OC4 aUNfc41XPuRQd8mCkSY65v6FNTEdz0n2MNM19huwFUU/yKbvzRzou7K2+SaKJTcqNHgi iKb84PzeF7RhP8ERwJsiNp6vFooXuKWPJHSvc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.34.78 with SMTP id x14mr31163708vdi.122.1321306725148; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:38:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.29.198 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:38:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111114201619.GD2164@hoeg.nl> References: <201111140101.pAE11XEa067064@mail.karels.net> <201111140802.13355.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111114193434.GC2164@hoeg.nl> <20111114201619.GD2164@hoeg.nl> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:38:45 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mwCdQ3bfo5-1XHmA-bj3-sVPMQ4 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Ed Schouten Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Tim Kientzle , Doug Barton , Robert Watson , mike@karels.net, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The strangeness called `sbin' X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:38:46 -0000 I don't mean to be rude either, but the cost-benefit ratio of something like ZFS and Capsicum versus tinkering with the layout of binaries in the filesystem should take someone about 30 seconds to evaluate. I'm not saying "let's not do it!" (quite the opposite - I mean, I still was hacking on squid until recently), but it's just looking at how many emails this topic gets versus others, I find it hard to believe the amount of brain cycles this thread COULD end up dedicating is .. well, very large. :-) Again, it's just my 2c, Adrian